Tuesday, August 31, 2010

1375 days ago today

have you written
any poetry
lately
she asked
well i remember
one i wrote
one thousand
three hundred
seventy-five days
ago today



she asked:
"Are you an artist?"
I f a lt e re d
what i meant to say:
"I'm living."

(I guess this makes this
an artist's commune)

my life as Picasso:


my longing an O'Keefe:



my words Duchamp:



"The word 'art' interests me very much.
If it comes from the Sanskrit, as I've heard, it signifies 'making.'"


thank you
i said
for
asking


Monday, August 30, 2010

memory of Sunday morning nostalgia for Georgia

note: this poem originally appeared one year ago today. depending on his or her needs and proclivities, the reader is encouraged to engage the text horizontally, vertically, or any combination thereof.

(any likeness to Tennessee is strictly coincidental.)


Sunday morning nostalgia for Georgia


feeling:
the ennui of
waking
after
making lattes in
Coca-Cola nightclubs.

mixing:
photo developer
with orange juice
and dreaming of
Floridian abortions
and Chattanooga matrimony.

my uncle
died
doing:
nothing.

Sunday, August 29, 2010

exceprt from notes on yesterday's meditation

these words originally appeared here on 28 August 2010:


my current journal

"start with pranayama followed by mantra. at some point it occurs to me: i'm just as far from the me i was in 2007 as the me i was in 2003. yet, the distance to the me i was the last year of college – before New York – seems closer than either. how are we to explain or graph these temporal geographies of mind, memory and nostalgia?"

"it was equal parts surprising and profound, obvious and sad. there is no going back to that summer when my enthusiasm for life and spirituality was eclipsed only by my inexperience and naiveté. this is not to lament their passing, merely and observation, because the perspective i enjoy now is informed not only by exuberance, or the novelty of something new, but fortified by the years of perseverance and commitment..."

Saturday, August 28, 2010

10 weeks and counting since

modified journal entry, 18 June 2010

I drove the stretch from the end of the Turnpike up to Cordele, which meant driving through the Ocala-Gainesville-Lake City corridor. Those invisible, unforgettable towns of O’Brien and High Springs and Live Oak haunted me, and I was literally retracing my past, passing by the signs for all the towns once – and ever? – soiled with N____.

The peanuts I ate that morning hung at the top of my stomach, a cramping reminder of the nausea and pain of North Florida, and the allergies kicked in next, leaving me with the headachy breathlessness of unidentified allergens and nostalgia. Twelve hours later, with everything quiet except for the sound of my yin and her cousin talking downstairs in the kitchen, I saw so clearly that my body was taking on the pains of the things my mind could not bear.

Seeing the banal green signs, I gave them only the slightest mention, like stopping at Leo’s for a slice or returning to visit Ocala Nikki, scourge and scoundrel and saint of Silver Springs. But underneath the flippancy of these utterances was the dreadful tissue-bound memory of soul-sickness and unspeakable miseries trapped inside the marrow.

By the time we switched drivers in south Georgia, I laid back and slept through Macon where N____ and I once stopped and took pictures of the graveyard:


Macon tombstones circa 2003

I finally opened my eyes at I-475 with Atlanta in the horizon, where a whole new set of flashback, beauty and trauma awaited me...

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

reflections on question, representation and beauty


part one: question


the question was asked:
"why are we here?"
some people answered.
some people said nothing.
one person wrote:
"so we can leave."

a) on the grossest level, this means nothing more (or less) than the certainty of bodily death; and, while this fact seems mundane, true understanding can only be obtained as a side effect of our ultimate demise. this being the case, i will refrain from speculation.

b) on a more subtle level, leaving means much more than the body – it means recognizing the transitory nature of our beings. the "me" writing this now is not the "me" i was when i started. for example, i have just heard the most amusing song:



but i know that this amusement will be gone by this time tomorrow; it will probably be gone within the hour. this is the nature of thought and emotion.

the longer i study the nature of the (by which i mean "my") mind, the more convinced i become of two things: the contents of the mind are ever-
changing; and, at least so long as we are embodied, the mind itself is ever-
present. memory inevitably fades or fabricates, and even those moments when we let go of identification can only be read against the moments that came before and after.

so, why are we here? we are here so we can leave, so we can let go of all those moments before and after – the moments we believe our existence can ever be fixed, defined or understood.


part two: representation

last night i sat in a room with eight other people and we stared at a machine approximately equivalent to the one upon which i am typing. the machine presented a two dimensional image of a person in Vancouver. the words spoken in Vancouver were transmitted to the room filled nine people in Florida. sometimes the technology worked well, but other times:



without saying so, the person in Vancouver was talking about the nature of representation. this is a topic with which i have some familiarity. afterward i picked up where he left off:

if one were to go to the beach, one could make a list of 50,000 distinct characteristics. each of these 50,000 characteristics would be unique to the moment. repeat this experiment 100 times. each time, the characteristics will be slightly, or vastly, different. and yet, there is some experience of the beach that is consistent. it cannot be named, nor can it be denied.

but this is too simple.

looking a little more deeply, one will inevitable encounter a problem. the sight of the water, for instance, is not instantaneous. the nature of light, the cornea, the optic nerve and the brain create a lag between perception and cognition that is insurmountable. therefore, to see the beach is actually to know the beach as it was; to hear the waves is to hear the waves as they were. the distance between us and the moment is structural, not conceptual, and everything in nature is pointing us to the answer given to the question in part one.

it is only
the persistent insistence of our existence
that prevents us
from
spinning
into nothing.


part three: beauty

an ancilla of last night's trans-continental discussion had to do with beauty and left me with more questions than answers. like all transcendental categories, beauty encounters substantial obstacles when one ventures to dip below the most superficial of levels, and here are three points i continue to ponder:

1) for starters if, as the truism argues, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" then who is it that trains the eye?


2) furthermore, in defining beauty do we not also necessarily define its lack? does not, as Difranco says, everyone harbor a secret hatred for the prettiest girl in the room? if so, is beauty nothing more than a side effect of ego, a severing of oneself from the Source of all creation?

3) and most perplexingly, what does Morrissey think of all this?


"It's gruesome that someone so handsome should care."

Monday, August 23, 2010

awkward restarts, boredom and chronology

5:45 - alarm goes off
5:52 - get out of bed
6:03 - shower
6:10 - shave
6:21 - pack breakfast
6:30 - leave home
6:57 - arrive at school
7:27 - make 93 copies
7:42 - unlock classroom
8:00 - class begins
9:18 - class ends
9:31 - return library book
9:43 - eat breakfast
10:01 - respond to emails
10:32 - lament
10:36 - mope
10:47 - pace
11:00 - meditate
11:34 - speak to yin
11:36 - compare notes
11:47 - find lost water bottle
11:50 - eat homemade pretzels
11:59 - journal
12:07 - procrastinate

and all this, just to keep from saying:

i miss the mountains of summer

Saturday, August 21, 2010

New York is like...

i first saw New York when i was eighteen years old. a woman who was not yet my lover lived on Long Island, in the same small fishing town where Jack Kerouac lived after achieving his celebrity. at the time i had not read Kerouac, and his eventual, looming presence was wholly absent from my mental geography.

but this is beside the point.

the point is that i was more concerned with other imagined shadows, and i went searching for them in the alphabeted streets that run parallel to the East River. this romance grew over the coming years, and in keeping with my own mythology, i moved to New York immediately after graduating university. in time i would come to know that what seemed like fate was nothing more than the tired pull of the city, the cliched story of town and country, the familiar parable of innocence, disillusionment and returning to the places you thought you knew. last week, and the photo essay that follows, were/are precisely that:


(apparently) i (don't) love New York
(any more)



day one

my yin and i arrived on a Thursday afternoon, and traveled to the Lower East Side to peruse the galleries that have popped up in the last decade. on the walls i saw portraits of ghosts i chased fifteen years ago:


R.I.P. Joe Strummer

somewhere in the back of the mind i couldn't help but smile at the memory of myself in the fall of 1995. the extent of humanity's collective hubris is truly amazing, but nowhere is it so pronounced as in the self-concept of an eighteen year old male on the precipice of a new romance. it became difficult for me to separate the city from the woman, and ironically enough i would find myself making the same mistake four years later. this, too, is beside the point.

my yin and i strolled onward, and one of the great joys of New York, then same as now, are the absurd promotions and storefronts. for example, where else but Manhattan would it ever be appropriate to use the following images to advertise a children's hospital?


people send their children there?

in other places we saw instances of accidental profundity, which happens to be my favorite type:


the awning makes a valid point

we also came upon one store in which my yin will never be allowed to set foot:


never, never, never...

these charming curiosities begin to lose their luster, however, when one begins to look a little closer:




day two

my yin and i took the train in from Scarsdale on the second day, transferred at Grand Central, and finally came above ground in Union Square. throughout the summer Miranda July (one of my favorite Renaissance women) has had an installation scatted along the park:


only in New York would a 2:1 concrete to grass ratio be called a park

her work, as usual, was simultaneously clever, accessible and interactive:


approximately true

others, while not as sophisticated, were nonetheless entertaining:


hopefully, that is...

after perusing the art we headed to the Integral Yoga Institute, where my yin used to volunteer and eventually took her teacher training. we took part in the midday meditation and then sat down to eat lunch with a very skinny swami. although i had heard rumors that the IYI served nothing but brown food, the meal was quite delicious, especially the red dhal.

moving further towards the Hudson River, my yin and i took a stroll along the High Line. in spite of being full of tourists (like us), the old abandoned train line has been turned into something truly unique, allowing visitors to gaze out on some of the new condos that sprung up as part of the previous decade's real estate boom:


curvy building


angular building


and groovy windows

when we finally came down from the High Line, we strolled through Chelsea to check out the sundry art galleries that have dominated the New York art world since the Nineties. the best among them was not a gallery at all, but this building:


150 W. 17th Street

which houses all manners of Himalayan art. among my favorites was this statue:


my love of fornicating Buddhas is well-documented

and these costumes, which my yin and i may use as inspiration for our respective wedding attire:


his and hers?


day three

our third day began in Brooklyn, where my yin and i had spent the night with a friend from her Williamsburg days. after a tempeh breakfast bagel, we headed over to PS 1 and saw a lousy exhibit entitled "Greater New York":


"Lesser New York" would have been more accurate

that night we met an old friend of mine from North Carolina. although we hadn't seen each other in years, his assistance some time ago made a great impact on the eventual direction my life would take, and after a(n unbelievable) meal at Zen Palate i had an opportunity to thank him, something i had been meaning to do since 2006. unfortunately, our post-meal constitutional ran later than expected, and my yin and i ended up missing our train back to Scarsdale by approximately ninety seconds:


by the end of the day, my yin and i were exhausted


day four

museums. museum. museums. we started our fourth day at the Whitney, using the member cards loaned to us back in Westchester. an entire floor was devoted to the work of Christian Marclay:


thank heavens for free passes!

although i had never heard of Marclay, his whimsically indeterminate composition methods astounded me. my yin and i ended up staying for two separate performances, and unbeknownst to me, my yin took this groovy picture while i wasn't looking:


me, with graffiti score in background

to top it off, Marclay is still alive, which is more than i can say for most of the artists in the next museum on our list:


the Metropolitan Museum

the place was an absolute madhouse (it was a Sunday afternoon) and our entire reason for being there was to check out the bamboo on the roof:


much better than steel and concrete

sadly, the skies were overcast and threatening, so my yin and i had to sneak up a half-guarded stairwell to even get a peak at the installation. a sign said that 5000 bamboo poles were used along with miles and miles of nylon rope:


allegedly this ramp can hold 400 pound visitors

afterwards, my yin's photographer friend met us outside the Met, and the three of us took a bus downtown to Alphabet City where our journey began. she showed us pictures of a haunted house in Michigan and told us about the hoarder who was renting her apartment. ironically, none of the pictures from that coffee shop came out, and the only explanation that comes to mind is that my yin's friend is some sort of photogenic black hole, literally distorting the camera's optics so that she can later use and redeploy it to her own ends:

i
m
age
miss
in
g

after this encounter we all took the L train to Brooklyn once more and had dinner with my yin's cousins and their respective mates. the six of us shared a fantastic vegan dinner, and aside from one carnivorous New Zealander, everyone went home smiling, happy and full.


day five

our final day in New York was rainy and, appropriately, fell on a Monday. we went into the city early and milled about Greenwich Village, idly talking about what it would take for us to live in New York again. it was a strange feeling because we both want to want to live in New York – but we don't.

the city has lost its sheen somehow, and i don't mean in the typical "good old days" nostalgia. the city has changed, undoubtedly, but not nearly as much as me. whereas i once saw only excitement, now i cannot help but see all the anxiety and agitation that masquerades as creativity or mania.

the one image that captured it most clearly for me was walking up the ramp form the Metro-North in Grand Central Station. the people all piled on top of one another, pushing and bumping their way towards the exit. they looked exactly like cattle lined up in a slaughter house, and it made no difference if the person was headed to Wall Street or the Bowery (except, of course, the Bowery is no longer the Bowery). every one of them was caught in the same game, stuffed into one metal tube after another and whisked around in the bowels of the city.

we went home early that day and had a quiet meal in Scarsdale with our hosts. we talked about the city, about art, about history and the upcoming wedding. we talked about so many things that it was soon approaching midnight, and my yin and i excused ourselves to go to bed. she fell asleep before me that night, and i lay awake in bed wondering if perhaps we should leave immediately instead of in the morning.

it was a foolish idea, an idea that i would have followed ten years ago, and that is precisely the difference between


the me i was

and


the me i am.